New Blog Post

There is a conversation many nonprofit leaders have with themselves around midyear.

It usually goes something like this: "I know I need to deal with HR at my organization. I just need to get through the next grant cycle. The next board meeting. The next program launch."

And then the next thing arrives.

HR gets deferred again — not because it doesn't matter, but because it never feels as urgent as whatever is in front of you right now.

The problem with deferring HR work is that it does not stay deferred. It accumulates. And when it surfaces, it surfaces at the worst possible time.

What "Deferred" Actually Costs

The costs of deferred HR work are real — they are just distributed across time in a way that makes them easy to underestimate.

The cost of a resignation

Replacing a single employee costs between 50% and 200% of their annual salary, depending on the role. For a nonprofit program director earning $85,000, that is a replacement cost of $42,500 to $170,000 — in recruiting, onboarding, and lost productivity.

That is before accounting for the mission disruption. When a key staff member leaves a 15-person nonprofit, a program can stall. A funder relationship can weaken. A community can notice.

Most nonprofit leaders have experienced this. Few connect it directly to the HR practices — or lack of them — that preceded it.

The cost of a compliance gap

Employment compliance issues do not announce themselves. They surface in a Department of Labor complaint, a wrongful termination claim, or a funder's due diligence questionnaire.

The most common and costly compliance gaps for nonprofits: misclassified employees, incomplete I-9 files, outdated leave policies, and inconsistent performance documentation.

None of these are complicated to fix. They are just easy to defer, until they are not.

The cost of funder scrutiny

Foundations are increasingly scrutinizing organizational health, not just program outcomes. Staff turnover, compensation equity, and HR practices are among the workforce indicators funders use to assess whether a nonprofit has the stability and infrastructure to deliver on its mission.

Grantmakers for Effective Organizations explicitly includes organizational and financial health in its pre-grant due diligence framework, and the Center for Effective Philanthropy's 2025 State of Nonprofits report documents that staffing instability and uncompetitive compensation are among the most widespread challenges in the sector right now.

The cost of quiet disengagement

This one is the hardest to measure and the most pervasive.

When staff do not have clear expectations, regular feedback, or a sense that someone is paying attention to their experience — they disengage. Not loudly. Quietly. They do what is required and nothing more. They stop bringing ideas. They start looking.

Gallup research consistently shows that only about 23% of employees globally feel engaged at work. In the nonprofit sector, where pay is often below market and staff stay for the mission, engagement is the competitive advantage. When it erodes, there is nothing left to hold people.

Why It Keeps Getting Deferred

Understanding why HR gets pushed back is not about assigning blame. It is about identifying the pattern so it can be interrupted.

Three reasons come up consistently:

• It feels like overhead. HR is often framed as administrative work that competes with mission. That framing is wrong — but it is pervasive. When every dollar is accountable to a program, investing in the people delivering that program feels like a diversion.

• It does not have a clear owner. In most small nonprofits, HR is absorbed into the ED's role by default. No one was hired to do it. No one has the time or expertise to do it well. And therefore may get done badly, or not at all.

• The consequences are delayed. A resignation does not happen the day the onboarding was incomplete. A compliance issue does not surface the week the I-9 file was left unfinished. The distance between the cause and the consequence makes it easy to believe the problem is not there.

What It Looks Like When the People Side (HR) Is in Order

The organizations that take HR seriously do not all have HR departments. They have made a decision that their staff are worth investing in and they have built the structures to back it up.

What that looks like in practice:

• Staff know what is expected of them and how success is measured.

• When someone leaves, the organization is prepared and not in crisis.

• Employment documentation is complete and current.

• When a funder asks about HR, the answer is clear and confident.

• Staff feel supported enough to bring problems to their supervisor before they become resignation letters.

None of this requires a full-time HR hire. It requires systems, documentation, and the decision to stop deferring.

A Midyear Checkpoint

The halfway point of the year is one of the best times to take an honest look at your people operations. Not aspirationally, but actually.

Four questions worth sitting with:

• Is your staff handbook current, or is it a document from three years ago that no longer reflects how you actually operate?

• Have you had a real (documented) performance conversation with every staff member in the past six months?

• If a Department of Labor auditor walked in tomorrow, would your employment files hold up?

• Do you know why your best staff members stay — because you asked?

If any of these questions produce discomfort rather than confidence, that is useful information. It is also fixable.

The Bottom Line

HR is not overhead. It is the infrastructure your mission runs on.

When it gets deferred long enough, it does not stay invisible. It shows up in a resignation, a compliance issue, a funder conversation that does not go the way you hoped, or a team that has quietly stopped bringing its best.

The half-year mark is a real opening. Not to add more to the list, but to finally address what has been accumulating on it.

What HR task has been on your "get to it later" list the longest? You don't have to share your answer, but it is worth knowing. Share in the comments if you're ready to name it.

#NonprofitHR #NonprofitLeadership #HRTailorMade #ThePeopleGap #MissionDriven #NonprofitManagement #PeopleFirst

If you are ready to take an honest look at your HR, the HR Health Check at hrtailormade.com/quiz-nonprofit takes three minutes and gives you a clear picture of where you stand. No prep required.